To interact more deeply with my followers on Twitter and in the ADE Community.
To better communicate the issues that I care about online.
So those were my intended purposes and here are the unintended benefits I found.
More meaningful interaction with alumni – I have had several reach out to me after a blog posts and without advertising the blog, people are liking what they read.
Better interaction with people at OU – There are several people at OU who regularly blog including Adam Croom, Keegan Long Wheeler, Laura Gibbs who I have had longer conversations and interactions with since I have blogged.
Documentation of my time. For example – i spent a lot of time in the innovation hub – the posts that I made on the innovation hub have been great for me to document my time and show what I have been up to.
Sharing my learning – the blog has provided me with a great place to share my learning that I will use with my students. It allows me to be more vulnerable to them and share where I struggle.
It has helped me work out some ideas in a rough form. Next week I am doing a Ignite session at IPadPaloozaOU (http://ipadpaloozaOU.weebly.com) This 5 minute talk is based on a blog post called A file called Dammit.
Overall, I am finding that blogging is an important part of my practice and something that I will be continuing. Much like research though, there are more things that I want to blog about than I have time to.. I have a list of to do’s and a few drafts hanging out.
Just like any creative practice, we have to learn how to manage our time and do it.. but overall this has been a valuable experience.
I want to give a shout out to OUCreate – because probably if the tool was not provided and I did not feel guilty about developing mine more as I ask students to.. I would probably not have done it.
I am excited to announce that I have been invited to part of the new working group for ISTE’s new Administrator standards. (many hope they will call them Leader standards.. but who knows)
ISTE is the International Society for Technology in Education and they write the standards are used in most US states and many other placed in the world for Students, Educators, and Administrators. They are used by districts and organizations like CAEP to assess the quality of education and technology use in an educational setting, and guide the curriculum on technology integration in places like Colleges of Education. The many uses of evaluation and also in making a case for funding, makes these standards very important for educators who care about utilizing technology in their teaching.
Every 5 years or so they do a refresh – starting with the Student, then the following year Educator, and then Administrator.
This year, I got the chance to attend the kick off for the Administrator standards at ISTE – which marks a one year process where a working group will meet twice during the year and other times online to draft the new standards. Throughout the year ISTE staff will be working to get feedback both online and face to face to make sure the standards are relevant.
I have also been asked to be part of the working group that will meet to help craft the standards and gain input. I am excited about this national opportunity and in supporting an innovative vision for technology integration into the future.
This post is just sharing that I will be part of the conversation, as the year progresses, watch this blog to see what opportunities there are for you to also be involved.
This is an online Edcamp that lasted from 10 to 12 eastern time and consisted of 3 sessions and an opening and closing. It was run by the group #Edumatch which is group that helps educators connect via social media.
I heard about it when Sarah Thomas posted about it on Twitter and I joined for a few reasons.
They were using the Unhangout from MIT which was a platform that is open source and designed to do things like online conferences. I wanted to explore it as a user for maybe use with our online masters. (btw.. it worked really well)
It was a chance for me to better connect with #EduMatch who I first met at #Badgesummit and now that I know to look for them, I am really impressed with their group work..(I followed many members individually but did not get the big picture). Read more about it here: http://www.edumatch.org/
It is a good way to reconnect and get my head in the fall semester.
So it started at 10 am EST (9 CST) with an opening session.. In this session the organizers introduced the event and also the side events going on. There is a badgelist page where people can earn badges https://www.badgelist.com/Edcamp-EduMatch-2017 and a google classroom where people could share resources as well. They did a really good job modeling using technology to support learning. And as someone who has trouble not multi-tasking the multiple modalities kept me engaged for the full two hours.
In the lobby while the welcome was going on and in between sessions – there was an chat room that people could leave messages.
Then at the top of each session, people could propose a session (just like EdCamp) and then people could join.
In the first session, I attended helping reluctant ed tech teachers, the second I lead was on what Preservice teachers should know, and the third I attended on Makerspace Events. I learned from all of them and they are relevant to my job and my students.
So you left the main room and then went to a small room with up to 10 participants.. They asked people to record if they could. When time was up we were asked to return to the main room or lobby.
We had a few themes come out in the session that were super important.. What is it most important for new teachers to know: Relationships and Planning and that hit most things.
If you are using technology or not – it all comes down to planning. Having a plan, archiving materials, and having a plan cuts down on classroom management issues.
For relationships – it is all about relationships with both teachers and understanding the chain of command in a school and following.. Ie.. even if you really excited to get started, you can’t burn up the chain and have to respect it.. Also, in a relationship sense – students all have issues – and behavior management is easier if you have a personal relationship with kids. Finally, in the last few minutes one participant shared that being culturally responsive is so important. This too is a manifestation of good relationships and being able to understand students as people.
This was a very enlightening session and I loved all the voices I heard – new and experienced teachers, other people who work with training new teachers, and technology people as well. In the end it was never about the tech, but more about the planning and relationships.. A good take away.
Overall I really enjoyed the format. There are few things that I would have changed.. ie.. had a place to share social media addresses, being able to boot someone out if they tried to hijack a discussion – but overall it was a great experience and I could see using it in the future with my students both graduate and undergraduate.
I hope to participate in more Edumatch sessions in the future. This group has great positive energy and a wonderful collaborative vibe.. Funny in that getting the full edumatch picture was probably one of the best things I got from #Badgesummit (completely unrelated really).
So today is the last day that OUInnovation Hub is open this summer so I was hurriedly finishing up a project I need for the first week of school using the Laser printer.
So last night I made a series of things I was making for a future event, (No pictures cuz a surprise) and I realized I forgot to make a piece I needed.. Dang it.
So last night I stayed up and I created a file to fix to project and get the missing piece. I also printed a few more “just in case” pieces to solve a problem later. I called the file missingpieces.ai. I got up early and headed over the innovation hub to use the laser cutter.
I printed the pieces and then I realized that the pieces were not centered properly and while done, they were not done right! So I had to print them again!! This time, I called the new file Dammit.
These pieces were were printed on a Acrylic (very expensive but I had bartered for it) so I did not want to waste a inch.. So I asked if I could flip the media over.. and print on the side that still has paper on it.. Normally, the laser burns through paper like masking tape, but it turns out, this paper was thicker. so what did I get? I got the missing piece, now perfectly centered, on a piece of paper that I would peel off, so once I pulled the paper off – it was blank..
A student noticed the name of the file as it printed- and I said – “Hey every project has a dammit file – it shows we are learning, right?”
So I had to print it again, use more of my acrylic and finally got the job done right.
So let’s talk about the file called Dammit, the extra trip to print, the extra prints, and the extra media.
There is a need for file called Dammit – and we need to expect to have moments of redo, moments of failure, and moments of frustration..
When we really work, on things that we care about, don’t we expect to have times to pause, regroup, problem solve, so that we get it right? Also, sometimes feedback is part of our learning process.
Throughout the process, I talked to the people working in the lab, I asked their advice. They were also shocked that I was left with blank piece. (We all learned something about this new media that we had not used before). They gave me solutions, Turn up the laser power, pull back the paper but in the end I had to redo the pieces.
I had extra media – why was I so concerned? Why I can’t I accept that learning and practice has a price?
I was concerned because I wanted to get it right the first time and I wanted to be an expert right away – but honestly, that is not possible.
However, honestly, to be proficient at something does not take 10 years – but it does take practice, and mistakes and files named Dammit.
So as I have had it mission this summer to learn how to make stuff in the Innovation Hub so I could encourage my students- I have improved, increased my skill, and had a lot of do-overs and projects that I have had to do multiple times. What I learned were nuances of the equipment, functionality of the software, human resources available to me, and a much better understanding of scale. I am also learning to trust my instincts and to let go of the perfect on the first run expectation. I have looked back at the some of the projects that I made early on. The 2nd and 3rd iterations are much better, but the earlier ones are not bad and they contain the marks of my learning and the growth. I am able to communicate my learning, share my projects with others, and give hints to help others be successful. Going through the process has increased my empathy and also made me a co-learner with students.
So Dammit! – in reflection on my summer spent making at the Innovation Hub I learned a lot and I actually put 21st Century Skills to practice- and it only took a few files named Dammit.
PS.. Once I finished the project, and chilled out, I used some extra acrylic to make myself a custom message board. Sometimes when we release the perfectionism then we can play.
So I am sitting in the airport about to leave #ade2017 – this is Apple Distinguished Educator Academy.. This was my first time attending as an alumni and got to welcome a new class of amazing individuals as well as interact with others from my class and those before me.
It is hard to encapsulate the experience in one post – and I may have other things to say about the community in the future.. but let me blurt out a few first thoughts..
These are the most creative and impassioned individuals I know..
What do we share in common – a few things.
We are creative and impassioned
We all have technology knowledge – each of our expertises are different – but we share that as a baseline.. (ie.. you don’t have to explain what you know with these people or why technology matters).
We come from many different backgrounds but are all committed to education and innovation.
We are able to develop their additional areas of expertise – so if you passionate about PBL or Challenge based learning – this a space where you can make a name for yourself on things that you care about (i.e.. I feel as though I can be more than an ed tech teacher, they get that those are just tools)
The Apple Distinguished Educator Community is hosted by Apple Inc of course – but have been a fundamentally important community to my professional development, fueling both ideas and renewing my relevancy to my the future teachers that I teach. We talk about all kinds of tools but more important the pedagogy behind them and the fundamental supports they can provide to all learners.
It has provided me with resources when I struggled, but motivationally and technically and a safe space to excel. I know that where I go personally and professionally is influenced by this dynamic network.
Apple Distinguished Educators for me is my Professional Learning Network (ADE=PLN)
This is what a PLN (Professional Learning Network) is supposed to be.. a ZPD – a Zone of Proximal Development where we can be more together than we can by ourselves. Being in a good one, makes me examine all the PLN’s to which I belong and consider the criteria or bar that I can use to judge their effectiveness and value to me.
I found this blog post from 2011 about PLN’s and what they should provide? Is your PLN providing this to you? and if not, what can you do to change that? or is the PLN worth your time?
Michael Mills uploaded a picture of me from ADE2017 – I think this picture is worth a 1000 words.. my last two favorite pictures have both been taken at ADE events. They leave me feeling energized, full of ideas, new connections, and opportunities – how do you feel when you finish interacting with your PLN?
Thank you to the community for your support, your opportunities, and challenging me to be better than I can by myself.
So this is my 3rd ADE Academy and I am so excited to be part of it again. I am excited to see my friends, get new ideas, and refresh.
ADE – stands for Apple Distinguished Educator – which is a group of educators who are focused on using technology to improve and innovate in education. Yes it is sponsored by Apple Inc.. but it is a collaborative community where we leverage lots of technologies along with our creative ideas to make a difference for students at all levels.
There are few ways that I benefit from a meeting like this..
It keeps me aware of trends in K-12 education so that I can best improve our teacher candidate’s preparation.
It helps to me test out ideas that I am having with peers and work out details.
I get to see what peers are doing and think about how I can match, improve upon or contribute to our collective successes.
I can investigate new technologies or new approaches. For examples, I will be seeking insights on iPad Pros. How are K-12 schools using them and are they worth the added expense for our faculty and/or students.. (It is really a tipping point analysis).
It causes me to stretch my own skills, learn more, and meet people who are different than me. While challenging, its a great way for me to practice to being open and vulnerable in my own learning.
Finally, it is a place where, even though I am somewhat uncomfortable because I am surrounded by so many exceptional individuals, it is a place for me to mentally relax knowing that I am among like minded mission focused individuals.
I was so happy to put my Out of Office for this week.
Something that will be new for me is to welcome the new class of 2017. While ADE Class of 2015 is the BEST CLASS EVER! I am energized by the excitement and new ideas of the class of 2017 and can’t wait to make new connections, collaborations, and friendships..
I leave in an hour, let the fun and learning begin…
So during the last school year the OU Innovation Hub Opened which includes a FabLab which is one of the coolest makerspaces around. Students and faculty can use it for free, but you are smart to bring your own wood and not rely on scraps.
I know this is important to my @OUEducation students in their preparation to be teachers, so when we switched to badging in Spring 17 we included a badge that they needed to go to the innovation hub or the Edge at the library to make something and share their experiences.
To be honest, I did not have time to go until summer, but now summer is here and two of my students got hired to work here next year, it is time for me learn to better support my students and work out logistics.
I am most excited by the Laser Cutter. I am constantly impressed by the cool wooden things that can be made.
First thing, I met with Brandt, FabLab Director, and he helped me make something after I took the safety quiz. He showed me a bit in Illustrator but then I knew that if I was really going to understand the process I better make some stuff. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCWREqLJeUaGF5AdrziWzSMQ
So first, I started with a file created by Brandt so I had the basics that I could copy..(but really could not, but it helped me get started)..
Then I went to Home Depot and bought some 1/4 inch plywood.
I checked out a computer with Illustrator in the College of Education and then started to take short cuts.
I started to download Vector Files from Vecteezy. (No judgement I am learning – originals come later).
So then I printed my first projects but messed up proportions something fierce.. (my 3×5 quote sign ended up being like 8 x 11) and I made my first puzzle and forgot about the back of it and had to reprint and got all the proportions wrong.
Lesson 1: waste some wood while you learn!
Then we printed some other things and got proportions figured out and then I was hooked..
Making a Complete Puzzle
I was first inspired to make a puzzle by a card that I found at Hallmark.
So I left for two hours, sat on Campus Corner and did a new illustrator file to print. (and if they were open on Wednesday I would be there today) .
(Lesson 1.a – don’t leave plywood in a hot Oklahoma car – it rolls up like a taquito)
Lesson 2: keep practicing, you will learn more.. (and remember a lot you had forgotten from grad school)
This time I used a sheet of Owls from VectEezy to make a custom puzzle .. I figure I will give to someone at Arthur Elementary (Arthur owls) They are our local ConnectEd School and are setting up a MakerSpace.
I put the owls into Adobe Illustrator – and used a red line to create a cut around each owl and each square.
So first I printed the owls and planned to cut around them. Then I made a rectangle and cut that out.
so what I ended up was this – a rectangle that had the outlines of the owls.
Each of the owls is cut out but fit back in the square.
Then I also cut out a rectangle that was the same size of the cut out square.
Then I used wood glue to attach the one with the cut outs to the plain one.
Lesson 3: a little Wood Glue goes a long way.
Then I realized I did not have a way to pull them out.. A girl had just cut out keychains and she had made these little pegs where she had cut out the hole for the keychain to attach. She had the idea – use the trash from her project to finish mine! So we cleaned out the trash tray and found enough to make the pulls to glue on.
Lesson 4: I learned more from looking at other’s projects than what I was doing myself. The community was amazing.
This student (Instagram: OklahomaMarigold ) had great ideas and I learned a bunch along with the Camp Crimson staff member that was working too.
So here is the final project
So what is the next step?
First I made this to match the size of the greeting card. It fits in a sandwich bag – but if I made it bigger by scaling it in Illustrator, I could make it big. (my first one is the size of a Melissa and Doug Puzzle)
I want to try to do it with original drawings and now I have plan. (I may use Adobe Illustrator Draw App to create a file to export to Illustrator to be able to draw with a stylus on an iPad)
Overall, this was a great start, I installed Illustrator on my computer today and plan to work on it while at #ISTE and print again when I return.
It is kind of like when my friend Mona taught me how to make hummus in grad school – mind blown – these projects that were so overwhelming to me are quite possible. This is the same transformation that I need for my students.. so I will keep learning and let them see me learn.
I am visiting my parents for their 49th Wedding Anniversary and my mother made a list of things that she wanted me to do while I was here. This included:
Help her upgrade her phone
Help her figure out how to renew her license (done online)
Update her Kindle Fire tablets (that have error messages about memory and app updates)
While I have been sitting here, my Aunt (her older sister) called me trying to figure out how she lost messages with the children she texts the most.
This is Day 1 – generally when I visit, my Mom has me go and visit with her Silver Sneakers class when they meet for coffee afterwards and I field questions about their cell phones, tablets, and computers.
I find that when we talk, technology always comes up.. More and more they can’t do things on paper anymore, their health insurance, their taxes, all have to be done online. Even 10 years ago, I regularly read how to find books in the library sessions during my regular visits.
Have we really thought about the update to technology and how it frustrates our parents and grandparents? Are we leaving them behind? We sat here talking about how she hears about her friends getting taken advantage of buying technology like phones and computers.. Maybe our need to efficiency needs to remember to help our elders adjust?
I am an Associate Professor and Apple Distinguished Educator – and I teach those studying to be teachers how to use technology in meaningful ways with kids (and also some practicing teachers). I have been a professor for 11 years and lead a 1 to 1 iPad program. So obviously I am an Apple fan but just to put myself in a adopter continuum – I will say I own two chromebooks, don’t have an Apple watch or iPad Pro and my first iPhone was a 6s Plus which I am still using. (and intend to for least another year) I try hard to be aware as many new technologies as I can and trends in education because it is my job to help my students learn about many technologies and choose which ones they want to use..
A lot of the innovations that they are talking about in the New York Times article are great, and in many cases these startups, while free now move to a freeium model – so while these things might be really useful now, the subscription costs (for which schools are not well set up) will be coming.
I find these also to be pockets of innovation – and don’t get me wrong we need pockets but I feel as though the large scale, company commitments were left off from this article. I appreciate the CEOs that spend their own money, but I also appreciate the large scale initiatives that are looking at larger changes to education.
For example, Google got a small shout out in their article for Google Suite (formerly known as Google Apps for Education) They said : “Already, more than half of the primary- and secondary-school students in the United States use Google services like Gmail in school.” A true statement and this free service has changed the workflow in so many schools. I can see it in my college students and practicing teachers getting their masters – we expect to collaborate in real time in our documents. Apple and Microsoft have just joined in on this, they are late the game, and don’t have the seamless nature to the collaboration yet. (ie.. they still have problems with conflicted copies etc..) However, educators are worried that this will become a freeium in the way that Dropbox SpaceRace gave free storage to University students and faculty and then forced us to pay once it was an important part of our workflow.
So definitely Google is changing productivity in education and is currently free. but what this article missed all together is more of the philanthropic nature of some of silicon valley’s work. I have had personal experience with ConnectED which is an initiative funded by Apple (100 million) in an agreement with the Obama White House.
I have had several opportunities to interact with the students and teachers at ConnectED and I can tell you that I believe this philanthropy is changing the lives and learning experiences of students, teachers and communities.
We have a Connect Ed school in Oklahoma City – Arthur Elementary (part of OKCPS) . This school was one of the first schools to get going with Connect ED. Not only are their teachers new iPads new ways with kids, many of whom are English Language Learners but they also have partnered with our College of Education to host practica students and student teachers. I have offered training to them and several of their teachers are pursuing masters’ degrees with us. Whenever I visit the school, I see many other educators from within OKCPS and other districts visiting to see how they can use technology to reach their students. Their impact is much greater than being measured.
In February, I was able to participate in a training for Connect ED leaders from about 75 schools that was put on by Apple. Meeting these educators who were not only preparing students to use technology but also providing for many of the basic physical and emotional needs of students who are often not in a stable environment and may need food, clothing and shelter was inspiring. These were some of the most dedicated educators I have ever met and I found myself inspired by their projects and stories. As part of this, Apple has been activating the Apple Distinguished Educator community to serve this group. In all of the examples in the NYT story, I did not see where educators were helping to lead these efforts. I can’t help but think of the other news story that keeps popping in my feed about the need for large reform and philanthropy about schools to include teachers. http://www.latimes.com/opinion/editorials/la-ed-gates-education-20160601-snap-story.html
I know many people will say that Apple has an up side, by giving away 100 million in tech, training and apps they must be setting themselves up to sell more. But lets look back to 1986 – in 1986 they did the Apple Classroom of Tomorrow (ACOT) which is the still the gold standard for planning technology professional development programs for teachers. In the end, they added to the collective knowledge but the research but that project really did not change their sales that much. Much of what they learned has benefitted all tech companies and ed tech researchers.
I know that Microsoft and other companies spend a lot of money on education too.. but to my point, I think the NY times missed the boat here, individual commitments from CEOs to create new educational products is great, but so are company wide commitments especially those that have a strong educator input. Where is the talk of that?
I have been spending a lot of time thinking about what it takes to create a culture of innovation and so this article attracted my attention. I think the first thing that I noted was that the article was not saying a culture of technology – but instead innovation. I feel as though we can often focus on technology as the innovation but instead we need to be focused more on the mindset.
As I read through the article, there were several things I noted about the examples they shared:
They allowed the teachers as learners to pick their passion projects and gave them time to pursue them. This is an example of allow the culture to build with a carrot versus a stick.. Ie.. teachers were rewarded with time, resources, and professional respect to pursue the ideas that they were most passionate about.
Teachers were encouraged to form small groups around big ideas that interested them. They supported each other and built community. This kind of community supports a culture of innovation.
The leaders were facilitators and did not use top down methods to get change but instead trusted their professional staff and supported them.
Leaders engaged professional networks – there is an example of connecting teachers interested in robotics with other teachers using similar tools. Again, leader as facilitator and connector not top down management.
It all came down the fundamental ideas of Diffusion of Innovations. One of the tactics discussed was to go to the laggards – the latest of adopters and get them on the side of innovation, and seeing them change help move the process along. I might disagree with this a bit, in that most diffusion research shows early or late adopters can produce this effect more consistently. However, I believe looking at the influential teachers, no matter their acceptance level of change, is worthwhile effort. Every friend you make, is someone who can drive the innovation process forward.
In the end the article stressed that innovation does not happen by itself and it requires leaders who are working towards creating a culture by trusting their team members and being open their ideas. As servant leaders, they take roles to assist their team in pursuing their interests towards that goal, and the structure they provide creates a safe space for innovation to grow.
Associate Professor at the University of Oklahoma Jeannine Rainbolt College of Education